1969 Commer "Van Gend & Loos" a photo on Flickriver


DAF Van Gend & Loos Vintage Trucks, Old Trucks, Cars Trucks, Train Truck, Road Train, Classic

The Van Gend & Loos judgment is one of the most important judgments in the development of the Community legal order. The European Court of Justice specifies that the Community constitutes a new legal order of international law for the benefit of which the States have limited their sovereign rights and the subjects of which comprise not only.


Geheugenvanbaarn.nl Jan Daatzelaar bij Van Gend en Loos

Van Gend en Loos ( VGL) was understood very differently at the time to how it is understood today. 1 Within the Court, it was seen as a compromise judgment 2 and the distinguished comparatists, Riesenfeld and Buxbaum, noted that the judgment neither ventured "beyond the line of minimum exposure" nor engaged in "a premature en tanglement with con.


Van Gend & Loos, Holland company Van Gend & Loos; tractor… Flickr

The seminal case of Van Gend & Loos offered the Court an opportunity to proclaim the doctrine of the direct effect of EU law within the legal orders of the Member States. In practice, this means that individuals may claim rights directly under EU law and enforce those rights before national courts.


Honderdvijftig jaren Van Gend & Loos 17961946 BoekenPlatform.nl

Judgment of the Court of 5 February 1963. NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tariefcommissie - Netherlands. Case 26-62. English special edition 1963 00001 ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1963:1 Expand all Collapse all


Fordson Van Gend & Loos / ATO a photo on Flickriver

The Luisitania, as students of history may know, would be hit German torpedo in 1915 and be a contributing factor in the United States entering WWI in 1917. But back in 1911, "The Lucy" was the queen of the ocean, and would soon be joined by The Titanic which was just being promoted at that time. The Oakland Journal was unable to verify if.


Van Gend & Loos Erwin de Rooy FotografieErwin de Rooy Fotografie

On 13 May 2013, at the seat of the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, a day of reflection took place to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the judgment in Van Gend en Loos, delivered on 5 February 1963.During the day, the judgment was examined as a source of and a framework for the principles which have shaped the constitutional structure of the European Union and from the point of view of its.


Doen Artitec DAF Van Gend & Loos met aanhanger Railhobby

Claes, Monica: Van Gend en Loos, de autonomie van de Europese rechtsorde en het leerstuk van de rechtstreekse werking, Ars aequi 2010 p.122-125 (NL) Szpunar, Maciej: Van Gend en Loos from the perspective of new Member States, 50ème anniversaire de l'arrêt Van Gend en Loos : 1963-2013 : actes du colloque, Luxembourg, 13 mai 2013 (Ed.


Het kantoor van Van Gend en Loos op de Groenmarkt, Tiel (1901) Tiel, Loos, Multi Story Building

This essay examines, first, the reasons for the extraordinary impact and iconic status which are attached to Van Gend en Loos. It argues that the explanation lies in a confluence of structural factors and not in the 'direct effect' doctrine simpliciter. It then looks at the 'darker' side of the case - a proxy for governance - its.


An early 20th century Van Gend & Loos delivery truck Van Gend & Loos Wikipedia

3 - The 'Van Gend en Loos moment' from Part I - Unity through law: inventing Europe's 'integration programme' Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015


1938 Paard&Wagen "Van Gend & Loos" a photo on Flickriver

William Phelan Chapter Get access Share Cite Summary This chapter discusses the Court's 1963 judgment, Van Gend en Loos, where the Court declared that European law could be relied upon by private individuals before their national courts.


Erfgoed spat van de Van Gend en Loosmuren De Erfgoedstem

The product imported by Van Gend & Loos was, at the time of the entry into force of the Treaty of Rome (1 January 1958), subject to a customs duty charged at 3 %, as it was classified under heading 279-a-2 of the 1947 customs tariff. Under the 1960 tariff, the product was moved to heading 39.01-a-1, to which a higher duty of 8 % was attached.


Westzeedijk Goederen van Gend & Loos 1957 Oude trucks, Vrachtwagens, Rotterdam

1 The 1963 decision of the European Court of Justice in Case 26/62 NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration ('Van Gend & Loos Case') is generally considered one of the most important decisions of European Union law (European Union, Court of Justice and General Court; European Community and Union Law and Domestic [Municipal.


Pin op Van Gend en Loos

The Van Gend & Loos case was triggered by a company that claimed that Dutch customs duties on a product imported from West Germany were in violation of the standstill clause contained in Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome.


Van Gend & Loos oldtimer truck in het spoorwegmuseum tijde… Flickr

Van Gend & Loos was a Dutch distribution company. It was established in 1809, and was purchased by DHL in 2003. History Van Gend & Loos was established by the Antwerp -based innkeeper and carriage driver Jan-Baptist van Gend. He had married a woman from the Loos family in 1796.


Wie in 1956 met paard en wagen voor Van Gend en Loos? Foto AD.nl

The Van Gend & Loos judgment is one of the most important judgments in the development of the Community legal order. The European Court of Justice specifies that the Community constitutes a new legal order of international law for the benefit of which the States have limited their sovereign rights and the subjects of which comprise not only Member States but also their nationals.


Van Gend & Loos Stichting Cultureel Erfgoed Enschede

Introduction With the fiftieth anniversary of the seminal Van Gend en Loos judgment of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) it is time to reassess its history and legacy. The judgment constitutes one of the core doctrines underpinning what is often described as a European "constitutional legal order." 1 But it does much more than that.